Discussion:
OT: Learn how to use a frickin' APOSTROPHE, please!
(too old to reply)
z***@email.com
2003-09-12 12:55:14 UTC
Permalink
Zack is basically tired of people's bad grammar and poor effort in at
least
presenting this newsgroup with halfway intelligent English.

The most offensive infraction to date is the goddamned misuse of the
freaking apostrophe. Because Zack has a big heart and way too much
time
on his hands, he is posting this little lesson on how to use the
damned
punctuation mark to hopefully educate some of the morons in this group
on how to sound at least like a normal human being and not a total
retard.

... and you're welcome.


The Apostrophe

This poor little 'ho is the most abused punctuation mark in the
language,
and it's a relief when morons get to know it - all it wants to do is
to please.

It only has TWO functions to perform and they're both straightforward,
but still it gets shoved in where it doesn't belong, left out of where
it
wants to be. or just generally misused like a dirty bottle with a
condom.

Let's take a frickin' moment to sort this out once and for all:

1. To show OMISSION

What's an asshole like me, doing in a place like this?

We started with two words, "what" and "is," but because this is
informal writing,
we want to express it informally, so we OMIT a letter from the word
is.

Examples:
I could've danced all night... (could have, not could 'of')

It's time for breakfast...(It is time)

It's been raining all day... (It has been raining)

So, in future whenever you see an apostrophe, make a goddamned
conscious effort
to work out what the original word was before the letter was omitted.
Sometimes, as in the case of could've and would've, more than one
letter has been omitted.

This will establish good freaking habits and alert you to the role of
the apostrophe.

2. To show POSSESSION

We went to Zack's shitty party. (Zack threw the party; it is the party
Zack threw)

Notice how the apostrophe comes at the end of the noun (Zack) and is
accompanied
by the letter 's' - a bit like a frickin' parol officer?

We knew who to blame for the porn mags out in the woods; there was mud
all over
Zack's shoes.

We're only referring to one person and he owns the shoes (and the
mags and a very satisfied smile, no doubt).

Confusion arises when the apostrophe is used with a goddamned plural
noun.

At the circle jerk, the men were not interested in seeing the boys'
perform.

More than one boy was ready to perform, so we add the apostrophe after
the 's'
(this is the performance of the boys).

So, the general rule is:

if there's one owner - add an apostrophe and then 's'
if there are two or more owners - add 's' then an apostrophe.

However, (and of course you're not frickin' surprised to hear this,
are you?),
there are exceptions to this rule.

For words which form their plural by changing internal letters
(instead of
adding 's'), the apostrophe comes before the 's'.

It was the children's turn to throw up.

Children is already a plural word, so we don't need to make it doubly
plural by
adding 's' apostrophe; however, we do need to indicate the idea of
ownership,
so we use apostrophe 's'.

Some other words which follow this rule are: men, women, people, feet,
deer, fish.

When you have 'double possession' - when two or more people (or
subjects)
own one item and both (or all) of their names are mentioned, the
apostrophe is applied
only to the second (or last) name.

We got herpes at Zack and Ravena's party.

The apostrophe is also used with many expressions of time (to show
that the time
period owns the other noun):

an hour's time; a year's waiting.

BUT notice that we do not use the apostrophe with possessive pronouns
(remember, these are the little fuckers who step in and lend a paw to
nouns).

After dinner at Zack's house, we puked for about an hour.

The bastard's lips were smiling. (The bastard owns the lips.)

The bastard smiled with its lips. (The bastard owns the lips, but the
pronoun its
is being used instead of the noun, so there is NO apostrophe.

You'll see "it's" and "its" used incorrectly nearly every single day
and in places where
it should never freaking happen. An easy way to make sure you never
confuse the two
is to ask yourself, if the words it is can be substituted in the
sentence- if the answer is yes,
then shove in the apostrophe.

If the answer is no, then sit on your freaking hands so you won't be
tempted.

The bastard smiled with its lips. (it is? - NO)

It's a lovely fucking day. (It is? - YES)
Dom
2003-09-12 14:23:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by z***@email.com
if there's one owner - add an apostrophe and then 's'
if there are two or more owners - add 's' then an apostrophe.
However, (and of course you're not frickin' surprised to hear this,
are you?),
there are exceptions to this rule.
For words which form their plural by changing internal letters
(instead of
adding 's'), the apostrophe comes before the 's'.
hmmm, and to think all this time I thought it was whether it already ended
in an "s", singular or plural, and nothing to do with the internal letters.

At any rate then, you failed to mention singulars that end in "s":

Chris' party was going great, until Zack doused his cock in Jack Daniels and
lit it afire.
Xbot
2003-09-13 18:21:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dom
Post by z***@email.com
if there's one owner - add an apostrophe and then 's'
if there are two or more owners - add 's' then an apostrophe.
However, (and of course you're not frickin' surprised to hear this,
are you?),
there are exceptions to this rule.
For words which form their plural by changing internal letters
(instead of
adding 's'), the apostrophe comes before the 's'.
hmmm, and to think all this time I thought it was whether it already ended
in an "s", singular or plural, and nothing to do with the internal letters.
Chris' party was going great, until Zack doused his cock in Jack Daniels and
lit it afire.
He probably "failed" to mention it because that's the incorrect way of doing
it. It should be "Chris's" in that sentence. Singulars that end in -s should
be treated like any other singular.

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/grammar/g_apost.html

"add 's to the singular form of the word (even if it ends in -s): James's"
Dom
2003-09-14 00:13:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Xbot
He probably "failed" to mention it because that's the incorrect way of doing
it. It should be "Chris's" in that sentence. Singulars that end in -s should
be treated like any other singular.
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/grammar/g_apost.html
"add 's to the singular form of the word (even if it ends in -s): James's"
Here's an equally (not) authoritative link at some university:

http://chuma.cas.usf.edu/~olson/pms/apostrophe.html

"Some writers become confused when they must make a possessive of singular
nouns that already end in s. As usual, you make the possessive by adding 's
to the word; however, some writers and editors argue that the two s' are
redundant and that therefore you can eliminate the second s, ending up with
the s'. That is, they argue that there is really no need to include an s
after the apostrophe, since the apostrophe already tells readers that the
word is possessive. Others argue that you should drop the final s only on
words of several syllables but retain it on short words. Since there is no
agreement on this difficult problem, you must make your own choice. However,
regardless of which option you choose, do remember to be consistent."

Regardless, I was basically wrong, since the redundant way is perhaps more
accepted. So thanks to you and Arnaldo for your input, even if you both
were slightly mistaken too.

What's the official authority on this stuff, anyway?
Arnaldo Horta
2003-09-13 20:59:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dom
hmmm, and to think all this time I thought it was whether it already ended
in an "s", singular or plural, and nothing to do with the internal letters.
Chris' party was going great, until Zack doused his cock in Jack Daniels and
lit it afire.
Actually, this is incorrect (amd one of my pet peeves). If the word ends in
s and is singular, it gets an 's, so.....


Chris's
Jesus's
Dirk
2003-09-12 14:34:43 UTC
Permalink
Before you go complaining about stuff like that, make sure your own
posts are perfect, *including* having a proper line lenght...

I suggest you either write entire paragraph without line break and let
your news reader to wrap the lines for you, or you use line breaks at
shorter line length than your newsreader wrap length.

Thank you.
--
.
Stash
2003-09-12 20:30:49 UTC
Permalink
"Dirk" <***@not.available> wrote in message news:bjsli3$1fl$***@news.cc.tut.fi...

<snip>
Post by Dirk
Before you go complaining about stuff like that, make sure your own
posts are perfect, *including* having a proper line lenght...
l-e-n-g-T-H

NYAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

B^P

---Stash
z***@email.com
2003-09-12 20:42:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dirk
Before you go complaining about stuff like that, make sure your own
posts are perfect, *including* having a proper line lenght...
I suggest you either write entire paragraph without line break and let
your news reader to wrap the lines for you, or you use line breaks at
shorter line length than your newsreader wrap length.
Thank you.
Before you go pointing out useless, sometimes uncontrollable shit like
line wraps,
maybe you could consider taking the goddamned meat out of your ass,
you pointless
minor, chemical nuisance. if you're going to take a reach, at least
defer to the point
of topic.

Zack thanks YOU.
agray
2003-09-12 15:31:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by z***@email.com
by the letter 's' - a bit like a frickin' parol officer?
Gotcha.

News Flash: Elitist Rant Invalidated Due to Misspelling of "Parole". Film
at Eleven.

Back in the can with you!
z***@email.com
2003-09-13 00:22:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by agray
Post by z***@email.com
by the letter 's' - a bit like a frickin' parol officer?
Gotcha.
News Flash: Elitist Rant Invalidated Due to Misspelling of "Parole". Film
at Eleven.
Back in the can with you!
Since Zack is not perfect and does not claim to be, Zack is appreciative of your
comments and correction. Zack will learn from what you have pointed out, which is
exactly what he was hoping to provide for his fellow XBoxers.

As far as being an "elitist," well, Zack can only attest to being a sexual elitist.
Zack demands excellence from a world that only expects mediocre.

Thanks for your contribution.
Paul Angstrom
2003-09-13 03:26:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by z***@email.com
Since Zack is not perfect and does not claim to be, Zack is appreciative of your
comments and correction. Zack will learn from what you have pointed out, which is
exactly what he was hoping to provide for his fellow XBoxers.
As far as being an "elitist," well, Zack can only attest to being a sexual elitist.
Zack demands excellence from a world that only expects mediocre.
Thanks for your contribution.
Zack, I'm curious about the origin of your "Zack Bastard" online
persona. Did you base it upon any pre-existing characters? It seems
somewhat reminiscent of what little I've seen of "The Rock" from the
WWE, particularly with the use of third-person references in place of
the pronoun "I."


--
A: Because it disturbs the logical flow of a message.
Q: Why is top posting a sloppy form of writing?
z***@email.com
2003-09-13 14:14:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Paul Angstrom
Post by z***@email.com
Since Zack is not perfect and does not claim to be, Zack is appreciative of your
comments and correction. Zack will learn from what you have pointed out, which is
exactly what he was hoping to provide for his fellow XBoxers.
As far as being an "elitist," well, Zack can only attest to being a sexual elitist.
Zack demands excellence from a world that only expects mediocre.
Thanks for your contribution.
Zack, I'm curious about the origin of your "Zack Bastard" online
persona. Did you base it upon any pre-existing characters? It seems
somewhat reminiscent of what little I've seen of "The Rock" from the
WWE, particularly with the use of third-person references in place of
the pronoun "I."
Yes, you see, since The Rock created the entire third person
perspective, something
writer's have ignored for centuries, Zack has found it a useful way to
present himself.
Thank goodness for the WWE for opening up such undiscovered literary
devices.

Zack is now on the verge of another breakthrough, recently discovered
at a Waffle House
in Virginia. It is something called "irony." More details will follow.

Thanks for your interest and please don't forget to tuck before you
zip.
Paul Angstrom
2003-09-13 19:52:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by z***@email.com
Post by Paul Angstrom
Post by z***@email.com
Since Zack is not perfect and does not claim to be, Zack is appreciative of your
comments and correction. Zack will learn from what you have pointed out, which is
exactly what he was hoping to provide for his fellow XBoxers.
As far as being an "elitist," well, Zack can only attest to being a sexual elitist.
Zack demands excellence from a world that only expects mediocre.
Thanks for your contribution.
Zack, I'm curious about the origin of your "Zack Bastard" online
persona. Did you base it upon any pre-existing characters? It seems
somewhat reminiscent of what little I've seen of "The Rock" from the
WWE, particularly with the use of third-person references in place of
the pronoun "I."
Yes, you see, since The Rock created the entire third person
perspective, something
writer's have ignored for centuries, Zack has found it a useful way to
present himself.
Thank goodness for the WWE for opening up such undiscovered literary
devices.
Actually, every time I hear the Rock spouting his third person
self-references, I'm reminded of Bob Dole's ridiculous pomposity when he
did the same thing in his campaign speeches. I often wonder whether the
actor who plays the Rock on WWE got the idea from Bob Dole.


--
A: Because it disturbs the logical flow of a message.
Q: Why is top posting a sloppy form of writing?
paulisme
2003-09-12 18:17:37 UTC
Permalink
Because you're such a grammatically-conscious individual, I thought
you'd want to heed the following corrections I've made to your post to
Post by z***@email.com
Zack is basically tired of people's bad grammar and poor effort in at
least
presenting this newsgroup with halfway intelligent English.
The most offensive infraction to date is the goddamned misuse of the
freaking apostrophe. Because Zack has a big heart and way too much
time
on his hands, he is posting this little lesson on how to use the
damned
punctuation mark to hopefully educate some of the morons in this group
on how to sound at least like a normal human being and not a total
retard.
... and you're welcome.
The Apostrophe
This poor little 'ho is the most abused punctuation mark in the
language,
and it's a relief when morons get to know it - all it wants to do is
to please.
It only has TWO functions to perform and they're both straightforward,
but still it gets shoved in where it doesn't belong, left out of where
it
wants to be.
The last line should have read "...but still it gets shoved in where
it doesn't belong and left out of where it wants to be." You used a
comma as if you were joining two independent clauses with a
conjunction, but the verb after the comma does not have its own
subject and therefore needs no comma.
Post by z***@email.com
or just generally misused like a dirty bottle with a
condom.
That last line is a fragment since there is only a verb and no
subject.
Post by z***@email.com
1. To show OMISSION
What's an asshole like me, doing in a place like this?
This last line does not need a comma. It should read "What's an
asshole like me doing in a place like this?"
Post by z***@email.com
We started with two words, "what" and "is," but because this is
informal writing,
we want to express it informally, so we OMIT a letter from the word
is.
I could've danced all night... (could have, not could 'of')
It's time for breakfast...(It is time)
It's been raining all day... (It has been raining)
So, in future whenever you see an apostrophe, make a goddamned
conscious effort
to work out what the original word was before the letter was omitted.
Sometimes, as in the case of could've and would've, more than one
letter has been omitted.
This will establish good freaking habits and alert you to the role of
the apostrophe.
2. To show POSSESSION
We went to Zack's shitty party. (Zack threw the party; it is the party
Zack threw)
Notice how the apostrophe comes at the end of the noun (Zack) and is
accompanied
by the letter 's' - a bit like a frickin' parol officer?
We knew who to blame for the porn mags out in the woods; there was mud
all over
Zack's shoes.
We're only referring to one person and he owns the shoes (and the
mags and a very satisfied smile, no doubt).
Confusion arises when the apostrophe is used with a goddamned plural
noun.
At the circle jerk, the men were not interested in seeing the boys'
perform.
This sentence would have been correct if the last word had been a
noun, such as the word "performance," which would have made the phrase
"seeing the boys' performance" a verbal and the object of the
preposition "in." Instead, you used a verb which needs no possessive
form of the noun preceding it (i.e. "At the circle jerk, the men were
not interested in seeing the boys perform").
Post by z***@email.com
More than one boy was ready to perform, so we add the apostrophe after
the 's'
(this is the performance of the boys).
if there's one owner - add an apostrophe and then 's'
if there are two or more owners - add 's' then an apostrophe.
However, (and of course you're not frickin' surprised to hear this,
are you?),
there are exceptions to this rule.
For words which form their plural by changing internal letters
(instead of
adding 's'), the apostrophe comes before the 's'.
It was the children's turn to throw up.
Children is already a plural word, so we don't need to make it doubly
plural by
adding 's' apostrophe; however, we do need to indicate the idea of
ownership,
so we use apostrophe 's'.
Some other words which follow this rule are: men, women, people, feet,
deer, fish.
When you have 'double possession' - when two or more people (or
subjects)
own one item and both (or all) of their names are mentioned, the
apostrophe is applied
only to the second (or last) name.
We got herpes at Zack and Ravena's party.
The apostrophe is also used with many expressions of time (to show
that the time
an hour's time; a year's waiting.
BUT notice that we do not use the apostrophe with possessive pronouns
(remember, these are the little fuckers who step in and lend a paw to
nouns).
After dinner at Zack's house, we puked for about an hour.
The bastard's lips were smiling. (The bastard owns the lips.)
The bastard smiled with its lips. (The bastard owns the lips, but the
pronoun its
is being used instead of the noun, so there is NO apostrophe.
This sentence should have been "The bastard smiled with his lips"
since the bastard mentioned is a person and not a thing.
Post by z***@email.com
You'll see "it's" and "its" used incorrectly nearly every single day
and in places where
it should never freaking happen. An easy way to make sure you never
confuse the two
is to ask yourself, if the words it is can be substituted in the
sentence- if the answer is yes,
then shove in the apostrophe.
Not even sure where to begin on this one; there are at least six
grammatical errors in it. You didn't use quotation marks around "it
is" to indicate that the words in the phrase don't perform their usual
functions in the sentence; you set apart the quote beginning with "if
the words..." with a comma, but you didn't use quotation marks. The
sentence should instead read like one of the following:

An easy way to make sure you never confuse the two is to ask
yourself,
"If the words 'it is' can be substituted in the sentence, then
shove
in the apostrophe."

An easy way to make sure you never confuse the two is to ask
yourself
if the words "it is" can be substituted in the sentence. If so,
then
shove in the apostrophe.
Post by z***@email.com
If the answer is no, then sit on your freaking hands so you won't be
tempted.
The bastard smiled with its lips. (it is? - NO)
Again you've used the wrong possessive pronoun.
Post by z***@email.com
It's a lovely fucking day. (It is? - YES)
I hope this helps when you get to sixth grade have to write your first
term paper. What an exciting day that will be!

Paul
Kyle Roberts
2003-09-12 19:27:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by paulisme
Because you're such a grammatically-conscious individual, I thought
you'd want to heed the following corrections I've made to your post to
Zack = teh OWN3D
Tony Francis
2003-09-12 20:52:39 UTC
Permalink
***@email.com wrote:

<snip>

Zack is such a looser! ;-)
--
Tired of Internet Explorer or Outlook Express? Try these programs:

http://www.mozilla.org/products/firebird/

http://www.mozilla.org/projects/thunderbird/
Mr Cydonia
2003-09-13 01:53:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by z***@email.com
At the circle jerk, the men were not interested in seeing the boys'
perform.
This sentence makes no sense. The last words should either be "the boys
perform" or "the boys' performance."


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"The world of comic books frightens me--all those dark, hideously deformed
creatures committing odd, unspeakable acts. And those are just the people who
read them." -- Michael J. Nelson
BabyJ
2003-09-13 07:13:40 UTC
Permalink
***Plonkage!****
Post by z***@email.com
Zack is basically tired of people's bad grammar and poor effort in at
least
presenting this newsgroup with halfway intelligent English.
The most offensive infraction to date is the goddamned misuse of the
freaking apostrophe. Because Zack has a big heart and way too much
time
on his hands, he is posting this little lesson on how to use the
damned
punctuation mark to hopefully educate some of the morons in this group
on how to sound at least like a normal human being and not a total
retard.
... and you're welcome.
The Apostrophe
This poor little 'ho is the most abused punctuation mark in the
language,
and it's a relief when morons get to know it - all it wants to do is
to please.
It only has TWO functions to perform and they're both straightforward,
but still it gets shoved in where it doesn't belong, left out of where
it
wants to be. or just generally misused like a dirty bottle with a
condom.
1. To show OMISSION
What's an asshole like me, doing in a place like this?
We started with two words, "what" and "is," but because this is
informal writing,
we want to express it informally, so we OMIT a letter from the word
is.
I could've danced all night... (could have, not could 'of')
It's time for breakfast...(It is time)
It's been raining all day... (It has been raining)
So, in future whenever you see an apostrophe, make a goddamned
conscious effort
to work out what the original word was before the letter was omitted.
Sometimes, as in the case of could've and would've, more than one
letter has been omitted.
This will establish good freaking habits and alert you to the role of
the apostrophe.
2. To show POSSESSION
We went to Zack's shitty party. (Zack threw the party; it is the party
Zack threw)
Notice how the apostrophe comes at the end of the noun (Zack) and is
accompanied
by the letter 's' - a bit like a frickin' parol officer?
We knew who to blame for the porn mags out in the woods; there was mud
all over
Zack's shoes.
We're only referring to one person and he owns the shoes (and the
mags and a very satisfied smile, no doubt).
Confusion arises when the apostrophe is used with a goddamned plural
noun.
At the circle jerk, the men were not interested in seeing the boys'
perform.
More than one boy was ready to perform, so we add the apostrophe after
the 's'
(this is the performance of the boys).
if there's one owner - add an apostrophe and then 's'
if there are two or more owners - add 's' then an apostrophe.
However, (and of course you're not frickin' surprised to hear this,
are you?),
there are exceptions to this rule.
For words which form their plural by changing internal letters
(instead of
adding 's'), the apostrophe comes before the 's'.
It was the children's turn to throw up.
Children is already a plural word, so we don't need to make it doubly
plural by
adding 's' apostrophe; however, we do need to indicate the idea of
ownership,
so we use apostrophe 's'.
Some other words which follow this rule are: men, women, people, feet,
deer, fish.
When you have 'double possession' - when two or more people (or
subjects)
own one item and both (or all) of their names are mentioned, the
apostrophe is applied
only to the second (or last) name.
We got herpes at Zack and Ravena's party.
The apostrophe is also used with many expressions of time (to show
that the time
an hour's time; a year's waiting.
BUT notice that we do not use the apostrophe with possessive pronouns
(remember, these are the little fuckers who step in and lend a paw to
nouns).
After dinner at Zack's house, we puked for about an hour.
The bastard's lips were smiling. (The bastard owns the lips.)
The bastard smiled with its lips. (The bastard owns the lips, but the
pronoun its
is being used instead of the noun, so there is NO apostrophe.
You'll see "it's" and "its" used incorrectly nearly every single day
and in places where
it should never freaking happen. An easy way to make sure you never
confuse the two
is to ask yourself, if the words it is can be substituted in the
sentence- if the answer is yes,
then shove in the apostrophe.
If the answer is no, then sit on your freaking hands so you won't be
tempted.
The bastard smiled with its lips. (it is? - NO)
It's a lovely fucking day. (It is? - YES)
Astrophix
2003-09-13 11:07:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by z***@email.com
Zack is basically tired of people's bad grammar and poor effort in at
least
presenting this newsgroup with halfway intelligent English.
The most offensive infraction to date is the goddamned misuse of the
freaking apostrophe. Because Zack has a big heart and way too much
time
on his hands, he is posting this little lesson on how to use the
damned
punctuation mark to hopefully educate some of the morons in this group
on how to sound at least like a normal human being and not a total
retard.
... and you're welcome.
Since I'm one of the few people on this planet that don't use English as
first language I really do appreciate your lesson. Please keep posting stuff
like this, I might learn something!

--
Astrophix
Steve M
2003-09-13 20:00:28 UTC
Permalink
LOOK, Instead of slagging off each uvvers grammers wi don'''''t you bloody
yanks try to talk proply like we does in england cus we invented the
langwage didnt we ehh!
Ha Ha Ha!
Post by Astrophix
Post by z***@email.com
Zack is basically tired of people's bad grammar and poor effort in at
least
presenting this newsgroup with halfway intelligent English.
The most offensive infraction to date is the goddamned misuse of the
freaking apostrophe. Because Zack has a big heart and way too much
time
on his hands, he is posting this little lesson on how to use the
damned
punctuation mark to hopefully educate some of the morons in this group
on how to sound at least like a normal human being and not a total
retard.
... and you're welcome.
Since I'm one of the few people on this planet that don't use English as
first language I really do appreciate your lesson. Please keep posting stuff
like this, I might learn something!
--
Astrophix
Paul Angstrom
2003-09-14 00:01:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steve M
LOOK, Instead of slagging off each uvvers grammers wi don'''''t you bloody
yanks try to talk proply like we does in england cus we invented the
langwage didnt we ehh!
Ha Ha Ha!
The problem is that Brits speak some sort of weird mutated form of
English. Now, Aussies on the other hand, their English makes sense.
Plus, their accent is more fun to listen to.


--
A: Because it disturbs the logical flow of a message.
Q: Why is top posting a sloppy form of writing?
Dom
2003-09-14 00:19:28 UTC
Permalink
Oh my zack, and I thought you were at least original in your rant:

http://www.users.bigpond.com/J_fersOffice/sample.htm

example: "However, (and of course you're not surprised to hear this, are
you?), there are exceptions to this rule."
However, (and of course you're not frickin' surprised to hear this, are
you?), there are exceptions to this rule.
Well, you at least didn't totally copy and paste...
Stevie
2003-09-15 15:26:37 UTC
Permalink
Nice one Dom!

That boy's a twat!

:)
Post by Dom
http://www.users.bigpond.com/J_fersOffice/sample.htm
example: "However, (and of course you're not surprised to hear this, are
you?), there are exceptions to this rule."
However, (and of course you're not frickin' surprised to hear this, are
you?), there are exceptions to this rule.
Well, you at least didn't totally copy and paste...
Loading...